World Security Network reporting from Berlin, May 31, 2007
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,

"The Kosovo-Albanian potential for unrest was demonstrated in the murderous attacks in March 2004"
Having visited the German troops in Kosovo back in the year 2000, I left Kosovo with the perception that a multi-ethnic solution of a future Kosovo was totally unrealistic.

Having seen the living conditions of the Serbian minority, the on-going “ethnic cleansing” – Serbs fleeing to the North – and the dimension of mutual systematic destruction of the infrastructure and having heard about the mutual torture and killings, I was unable to imagine that the dream of a democratic and multi-ethnic community would come true within the next decades.

I do not want to address the history, ethnic-religious and geopolitical aspects we covered in previous newsletters (Kosovo - The Key Security Issue in the Balkans, If Kosovo Fails, the West Fails). Instead, I would like to focus on the issue of the future status of Kosovo.

Standards before status

This was the official philosophy of the UN, NATO and the EU based upon UN Resolution 1244. It was the disbelief that both issues could be improved sequentially: First the standards and then the status. It proved to be the wrong approach because both issues are the two sides of the same medal “Kosovo” which was a kind of UN protectorate after the war ended in June 1999 with the agreement signed on June 9 in Kumanovo, Macedonia..

It would be wrong to say that the various activities of the UN, NATO and EU – including the Balkan Contact Group(Germany, France, Italy, Russia, the UK and the US) – were without any success. But the fragility of the situation was proven by the massive Albanian attacks against the Serb minority in March 2004.

In October 2005, the UN Secretary General appointed the former Finnish President Marti Ahtisaari as a special UN envoy to start negotiations with Belgrade and Pristina about the future status of Kosovo. Marti Ahtisaari’s attempt to reach an agreement between Serbia and Kosovo through negotiations failed after 13 months. In May 2007, Marti Ahtisaari handed his proposal about the future status of Kosovo over to the UN Secretary General. In essence, the Secretary General advocates an independent Kosovo under international control – militarily and politically.

The ball is now in the corner of the UN Security Council.

Kosovo – key for stability and security in The Balkans ...To read more you have to register here for only USD 99 per year


Register now and read the full text of all newsletters as a subscriber for only USD 99 a year !


Dieter Farwick
Global Editor-in-Chief
World Security Network Foundation

BrigGen (ret.)
Former Force Commander and Chief Operations at NATO HQ



U.S. Ambassador Richard Holbrooke: Kosovo's Freedom

Richard Holbrooke, Former US Ambassador to the UN on the future of Kosovo - an exclusive WSN TV interview

General ret. Reinhardt on Kosovos future status

General (ret.) Dr. Klaus Reinhardt, former Commander of KFOR, on Kosovo’s future status - an exclusive WSN TV interview

German Chief of Staff General Schneiderhan on Peace Enforcement Missions

Wolfgang Schneiderhan, Chief of Staff German Federal Armed Forces - an exclusive WSN TV interview

Serbian Defence Minister Stankovic on the Status of Kosovo

Zoran Stankovic, Minister of Defence, Republic of Serbia on the status of Kosovo - an exclusive WSN TV interview

Macedonian Foreign Minister Antonio Milosoki European Union and Macedonia

Antonio Milosoki, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia on the European Union and Macedonia - an exclusive WSN TV interview

Harvard Professor Karl Kaiser on the Rise of Nationalism

Professor Karl Kaiser, Visiting Scholar, Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University - an exclusive WSN TV interview



Add your 10 best friends here to receive the WSN Newsletter!

Join the World Security Network now!

Support the World Security Network Foundation - "Networking a Safer World"

Results of Last Week's Poll:
The G8 Summit on June 8 in Germany will cost more than 100 million euros and will attract a lot of demonstrators – many of them militant. What is your view on the cost-benefit relation?
The integration of China and India would increase the benefit with the same costs

67 %

These high-level meetings are of limited value

22 %

It is very important that the G8 heads of state meet regularly

11 %

A location should be selected which is more isolated and easier to protect

0 %



If you do not wish to receive future WSN newsletters, please click here.
You can also write to postmaster@worldsecuritynetwork.com


© 2010 World Security Network | info@worldsecuritynetwork.com