Afghanistan
Africa
Americas / USA
Asia
Broader Middle East
China
Europe
India
Iran
Iraq
Israel / Palestine
Japan
Koreas
NATO
Pakistan
Russia
Terror
Other


Democracy
Energy Security
Environment
Human Rights
Peace and Conflict
Religion and Politics
Tolerance
Other


Africa
Americas / USA
Asia
Europe
Greater Middle East
Latin America
Russia


EU
NATO
OSCE
UN




The U.S. have finished the "war" in Iraq and withdrawn their combat troops. However, they are leaving about 50,000 soldiers behind. These soldiers are supposed to train the Iraqi army and police force.

What do you think will happen?

President Barack Obama keeps his word and increases his credibility
The insurgents will restart their attacks
Iraqi political leaders are forced to find a compromise
Iran will increase its influence in Iraq

Submit   Previous Polls

Chinese release surgeon who exposed SARS cases
written by: Joseph Kahn, 21-Jul-04

Reuters
Jiang Yanyong, the military doctor who exposed China's SARS cover-up last year is seen in this undated file photo taken in Beijing.
Pressure on Beijing and doctor's status cited

BEIJING The Chinese military authorities have released the prominent surgeon who exposed China's SARS cover-up and condemned the 1989 crackdown on democracy protesters, apparently bowing to the doctor's status as a hero in China and to international pressure to free him, people informed about his case said.

The doctor, Jiang Yanyong, 72, was allowed to return home late Monday night after about 45 days in military custody, where he was subjected to political indoctrination sessions and investigated for possible criminal activity, according to one person told about his case. He is not expected to be charged with a crime.

Jiang, a senior member of the Communist Party who holds a rank that corresponds to lieutenant general or major general in the West, is expected to be kept under surveillance and to be prohibited from making contact with outsiders. It is possible that his release will be followed by house arrest.

Yet the decision to allow him to return home appears to amount to a rare victory for an individual who directly and repeatedly confronted Communist Party leaders. In a letter released in February, Jiang pressed state leaders to admit that the armed crackdown on demonstrators in and near Tiananmen Square in 1989, perhaps the single most sensitive political vulnerability for China's current generation of leaders, was a mistake.

While there is no evidence that senior officials are reconsidering their position that the action was justified, the decision to detain and then release Jiang suggests that leaders are hamstrung in grappling with high-level dissent on the issue. That may fuel hopes that the party will sooner or later apologize for the brutal suppression of protesters that year.

“I think many people believe that detaining him was stupid,” said a party official interviewed while Jiang was being held. “On the one hand, he can't be allowed to criticize without punishment. But on the other, party elders do not allow their own people to be punished for nothing. He is elderly, he has a certain status, and he did nothing wrong.”

The detention prompted sustained international criticism from human rights groups. Condoleezza Rice, the U.S. national security adviser, urged Foreign Minister Li Zhaoxing to release Jiang when she visited Beijing this month.

There was no official announcement of Jiang's detention on June 1, and the government has also said nothing publicly about his release. Jiang's wife and children could not be reached for comment.

But it seems likely that the authorities will claim internally that Jiang exhibited remorse for his actions and, in Chinese party terminology, made progress in his political thinking under the instruction of military authorities who supervised him.

While in custody, Jiang was made to write a “thought report” each day. By the end of his detention, Jiang had altered the report in a way that may allow his interrogators to claim that he had admitted errors, according to the person informed about the case.

Supporters of Jiang grew optimistic about the prospects for his release this month.

On July 7, two officers from the military's General Logistics Department visited Jiang's wife, Hua Zhongwei, and informed her that Jiang had “shown progress in his thoughts.” Hua was shown a seven-page statement written by Jiang that contained reflections that the authorities argued were confessional in tone.

The doctor, this person said, wrote that he had learned that the “Communist Party confronted by the student protests was much like a patient with complicated colorectal cancer where, without emergency surgery, death was imminent.” The statement suggests that Jiang acknowledged the threat the party perceived in the student-led protests. It appears to fall short of an endorsement of the decision to deploy the army to crush the protests.

Jiang has maintained that he had no role in circulating his February letter, which was addressed to top party and government officials, to the domestic or international media. But he acknowledged in his thought report that the letter may have gotten into the hands of people who could use it “for their own purposes.”

Recognizing errors is considered a test of political rehabilitation for those who violate party discipline. The statements as described would appear to fall short of the full self-confession that the authorities often require before releasing an opponent.

Jiang became a well-known national and international figure last year. At that time he disclosed in a letter to top leaders, which was also obtained by the international media, that numerous Beijing hospitals, including the elite No. 301 Military Hospital, where he is a semiretired senior surgeon, had far more SARS patients than health authorities were admitting at the time.

Shortly thereafter, Chinese leaders fired the minister of health and the mayor of Beijing, acknowledged having provided inaccurate information about the spread of the disease and began a massive nationwide effort to combat severe acute respiratory syndrome. Jiang was initially hailed as a hero even by the state media, although coverage soon ceased and he and his family were put under surveillance.

Jiang told friends that as he approached his twilight years he intended to use his newfound celebrity for greater good. In February, it became clear that his target was the 1989 Tiananmen crackdown. Discussing the event is taboo in party circles. Officials fear that reopening that wound of Tiananmen could lead to demands for political reform and threaten current leaders, nearly all of whom owe their positions to the political upheaval that followed the crackdown.

In a letter addressed to the leadership, and obtained by The New York Times and other publications on the eve of the annual legislative session in March, Jiang described his own role treating wounded civilians on the night of the crackdown, June 4, 1989. He said two party elders, including the former president Yang Shangkun, now deceased, had later told him that the party would sooner or later need to admit that killing civilians was wrong.

The letter was treated as a political emergency, and the surveillance around Jiang was tightened. But it was not until June 1 when, under instructions from Jiang Zemin, the military chief and China's semiretired top official, Jiang and Hua were intercepted on their way to an appointment and taken into custody, people told about his case said.

The conditions of their internment at a military medical facility were unusually comfortable, the person close the family said. Jiang was given a private room and allowed to watch television. Hua, who is a medical researcher, was allowed to visit her husband regularly. She was released in mid-June.

Published in: The New York Times

Register here for free

Print this article
Email

Password
forgot password?








NATO's new Strategic Concept
The Human Codes of Tolerance and Respect
 

Look for men and women of excellency, encourge them, foster them, and give them lasting support in every way.Cultivate and inspire elities in our democracies which do not simply enjoy privileges but are willing to assume social responsibilities.
 

The greatest danger confronting our world is moral relativism
 

We should not adopt but rather shape reality- networking a better and safer world with imagination.
 

Let`s start a new global progressive foreign policy to promote democratic developments and to get rid ...
 

Freedom is the foundation for knowledge, development, and progress. Powerful countries are developed because they are free.
 

Only a genuine reconciliation policy between societies can bring about a true and lasting peace and lay the foundations of eternal peace between former enemies.
 

Isolate the negative elements from the peaceful open-minded majority in the Islamic World.
 

We need a new NATO Double-Track decision consisting of two equally important columns:
military containment and an active dialog with the Islamic cultures.
 

For each conflict we need a holistic formula for peace based on diplomacy plus power plus reconciliation.
 

Beijing and the Pope gain from the establishment of diplomatic relations
 

Broader Middle East

Nations and societies in the "Broader Middle East" should overcome secular schism, seek a kind of enlightment and regain momentum to reach the exsellent scientific, moral and economic of the "Glory past".
 
Americas / USA

A new U.S. foreign policy is needed including: brilliant strategies, imagination and creativity, excellency ...
 
China

Beijing could recognize three advantages through new diplomatic relations with the Vatican
 
Europe

Give more power to the European Parliament, including the election of “European Government”.
 
India

Improve your governance and administration, fight corruption, wage more decentralisation and privatisation, improve your ecucation system.
 
Iran

Stop the development of Weapons of Mass Destruction
 
Iraq

Three Strong Federal States Comprised of Kurds, Shiites and Sunnis Are Needed Now in Iraq with a Division of Oil Income - or a Bloody Civil War Is Unavoidable
 
Islamic States

A New NATO Double-Track Decision on Terrorism and Dialogue with Islam Is Needed
 
Israel / Palestine

Israel, Palestine and its Arab neighbors need common values, interests and goals: Peace is possible !
 
NATO

For the European NATO countries it is intolerable to spend 61% what the US spends but only achieve 10% of the US power projection capacit. The issue is not to spend more but to spend in a way that produces real European power projection capabilities.
 
Koreas

Both countries should mitigate the tensions and aim for a re-unification as a free and democratic entity
 
Russia

Russia has to realize the vital importance of further democratic development. It has to revive its own democratic traditions.
 
Terror

Terrorism is a menace for mankind and should find a world wide coordinated response
 
Democracy

Don't ever ask "What's in for me?" Instead, ask "What is good for my country?"
 
Human Rights

Cuban dissidents should follow Estonia’s example of establishing a “Free Parliament” in exile with the support of the EU.
 
Peace and Conflict

We must welcome tolerant patriotism, while containing and combating nationalism and chauvinism.
 
Religion and Politics

The understanding that reconciliation heals memory is crucial for the achievement of true peace between ...
 
Tolerance

China should enhance individual freedoms, religious and cultural tolerance and protection of minorities.
 
UN

UN must adjust the Charter and the structure to the "new world"
 



© 2010 WorldSecurityNetwork | info@worldsecuritynetwork.com