Afghanistan
Africa
Americas / USA
Asia
Broader Middle East
China
Europe
India
Iran
Iraq
Israel / Palestine
Japan
Koreas
NATO
Pakistan
Russia
Terror
Other


Democracy
Energy Security
Environment
Human Rights
Peace and Conflict
Religion and Politics
Tolerance
Other


Africa
Americas / USA
Asia
Europe
Greater Middle East
Latin America
Russia


EU
NATO
OSCE
UN




During the Munich Security Conference, it became obvious that the major powers still disagree over how to deal with Iran.
What is your view?

Follow China’s example and opt for more negotiations
Iran is simply buying time again
Tougher sanctions are needed – with or without UN support
Military options should be pursued

Submit   Previous Polls

The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict in the 21st Century
written by: Babak Khalatbari, 23-Jul-04

Babak Khalatbari, M.A., Konrad-Adenauer-Scholar, University of Münster, Germany
Attack helicopters and suicide bombers -- a modern tale of an Arab David and a Jewish Goliath

The founding of Fatah (Harakat al-Tahrir al-Filastin) in 1959 and its choice of a strategy of armed conflict can be described as a Palestinian reaction to the failure of Arab governments to take action on the Palestine question. Five years later, the Palestine Liberation Organization (Munazzamat al-Tahrir al-Filastiniyya) was founded in Jerusalem at the request of the Arab League to represent Palestinian rights and interests, since 1969 under Arafat's leadership.

Utopianism versus realism

During the first Intifada that erupted in 1987, first secret negotiations began. Following the Madrid conference in 1991, the so called Oslo process was established in late 1993. The resulting joint statement and common insight of both parties paved the way for peace and won the Nobel Peace Prize for Yitzhak Rabin, Shimon Peres and Yasser Arafat in 1994. The most important element of the compromise was the two-state model, with step-by-step implementation of Palestinian authority. Utopianism seemed to have trumped realism, but problematical topics such as the Jerusalem question, the status of refugees and the issue of Jewish settlements had been pushed aside.

Traps and gaps of the peace process

The Arab-Israeli peace process stalled with the assassination of Yitzhak Rabin in 1995, the ascendancy of a new Likud government in Israel and the increasing ineffectiveness of Yasser Arafat. The aftermath of these events has brought daunting years for Israel and Palestine. The Camp David conference in June 2000 ended without result, and all new initiatives, such as the Taba conference, came too late because the Middle Eastern helix of violence was revived in late 2000 in the form of the second Intifada.

The year 2002 began with the most violent confrontation between Jews and Arabs in Palestine since the territory west of the Jordan River was partitioned in 1947. Indeed, the collapse of the peace process and the outbreak of the second Intifada have caused the Jewish-Israeli population to shift sharply to the right. 98 percent of Israelis supported the reoccupation of parts of the West Bank in Operation Defensive Shield in late March 2002. Many Israelis now believe that the majority of Palestinians do not anymore want a state of their own next to Israel, but rather one state in historical Palestine that includes Israel. The Palestinians have contributed to Israel's strong degree of suspicion and deep mistrust, particularly with regard to the separation fence. The escalating conflict has taken a heavy toll on lives, with more than 900 Israeli and about 2700 Palestinian victims of armed hostilities by late 2003.

The economic boomerang: War does not pay ...more

To continue this analysis/article please register here!



Register here for free

Print this article
Email

Password
forgot password?








NATO's new Strategic Concept
The Human Codes of Tolerance and Respect
 

Look for men and women of excellency, encourge them, foster them, and give them lasting support in every way.Cultivate and inspire elities in our democracies which do not simply enjoy privileges but are willing to assume social responsibilities.
 

The greatest danger confronting our world is moral relativism
 

We should not adopt but rather shape reality- networking a better and safer world with imagination.
 

Let`s start a new global progressive foreign policy to promote democratic developments and to get rid ...
 

Freedom is the foundation for knowledge, development, and progress. Powerful countries are developed because they are free.
 

Only a genuine reconciliation policy between societies can bring about a true and lasting peace and lay the foundations of eternal peace between former enemies.
 

Isolate the negative elements from the peaceful open-minded majority in the Islamic World.
 

We need a new NATO Double-Track decision consisting of two equally important columns:
military containment and an active dialog with the Islamic cultures.
 

For each conflict we need a holistic formula for peace based on diplomacy plus power plus reconciliation.
 

Beijing and the Pope gain from the establishment of diplomatic relations
 

Broader Middle East

Nations and societies in the "Broader Middle East" should overcome secular schism, seek a kind of enlightment and regain momentum to reach the exsellent scientific, moral and economic of the "Glory past".
 
Americas / USA

A new U.S. foreign policy is needed including: brilliant strategies, imagination and creativity, excellency ...
 
China

Beijing could recognize three advantages through new diplomatic relations with the Vatican
 
Europe

Give more power to the European Parliament, including the election of “European Government”.
 
India

Improve your governance and administration, fight corruption, wage more decentralisation and privatisation, improve your ecucation system.
 
Iran

Stop the development of Weapons of Mass Destruction
 
Iraq

Three Strong Federal States Comprised of Kurds, Shiites and Sunnis Are Needed Now in Iraq with a Division of Oil Income - or a Bloody Civil War Is Unavoidable
 
Islamic States

A New NATO Double-Track Decision on Terrorism and Dialogue with Islam Is Needed
 
Israel / Palestine

Israel, Palestine and its Arab neighbors need common values, interests and goals: Peace is possible !
 
NATO

For the European NATO countries it is intolerable to spend 61% what the US spends but only achieve 10% of the US power projection capacit. The issue is not to spend more but to spend in a way that produces real European power projection capabilities.
 
Koreas

Both countries should mitigate the tensions and aim for a re-unification as a free and democratic entity
 
Russia

Russia has to realize the vital importance of further democratic development. It has to revive its own democratic traditions.
 
Terror

Terrorism is a menace for mankind and should find a world wide coordinated response
 
Democracy

Don't ever ask "What's in for me?" Instead, ask "What is good for my country?"
 
Human Rights

Cuban dissidents should follow Estonia’s example of establishing a “Free Parliament” in exile with the support of the EU.
 
Peace and Conflict

We must welcome tolerant patriotism, while containing and combating nationalism and chauvinism.
 
Religion and Politics

The understanding that reconciliation heals memory is crucial for the achievement of true peace between ...
 
Tolerance

China should enhance individual freedoms, religious and cultural tolerance and protection of minorities.
 
UN

UN must adjust the Charter and the structure to the "new world"
 



© 2010 WorldSecurityNetwork | info@worldsecuritynetwork.com